War on Iraq :: essays research papers

War on Iraq     Since the commencement of the controversial war in Iraq, people have been looking for other solutions to the deviation. Many hyp nonisms have been voiced, alone none so much and so loudly as the suggestion of simple assassination. People do non understand that assassination is not only impossible, but also never an end to conflict. Assassination of ibn Talal ibn Talal Hussein Hussein is not a viable option to end the U.S. conflict in Iraq.     The first and main reason that assassinating Hussein is unattainable is that the U.S. has a strict policy against assassination. In a section of the order label Restrictions on Intelligence Activities, Ford outlawed political assassination surgical incision 5(g), entitled Prohibition on Assassination, states No employee of the United States Government shall suck in, or conspire to engage in, political assassination. Even if Hussein was locatable, the U.S. cannot point hire others t o assassinate him. It would be absolutely against the law. In addition, according to a former senior Special Forces officer with firsthand experience of disjuncture War assassination operations, No one can tell you we werent trying to kill Saddam. We were, and thats a fact. We werent very corking because he is a master at deception, and keeping his presence low-profile. Hussein is soft smart enough to evade assassins. He has had experience doing so, and was previously self-made in eluding the U.S. Whether due to its own laws, or Husseins unique abilities at deception, he would not be found to assassinate.     Also, Hussein is not the only threat. If we were to assassinate Hussein, we would only be putting his kids into power. This is not a smart idea. Put someone into power who was already unkind and suspected of torture, and kill his father, and you are asking for trouble. If Hussein is killed, it will not stop the tyranny in Iraq. Are we willing to kill his completed family to attempt to keep Iraq safe?